cometa53 ha scritto:...ma alla fine dopo due anni del 3D, qualcuno qui del forum l'ha presa, ascoltata?
Credo che questa recensione trovata su amazon.com renda bene l'idea in quanto ne parla risoetto alla Sennheiser HD650 da molti conosciuta ma anche aprescindere da quella:
ByMilkteaon May 17, 2014
Verified Purchase
Why did you choose this rating?
* Because the sound quality is top-notch
What did you like or dislike?
* Like the sound signature and comfort
* Dislike the price
Who would you recommend this to?
* Anyone looking for a sealed equivalent of the Sennheiser HD650 (neutral and laid-back).
Now that I've answered Amazon's list of questions, follow is my short review...
I'd start off by saying these cans sound just like the Sennheiser HD650. Yes, I was really surprise when I first tried them on. The SRH1540 has the same sound signature as the HD650. If Shure had replaced their logo on the headphone with just a letter 'S', I would have thought that it was a Sennheiser product; a refresh of the famous HD650.
So why did I purchase the SRH1540? Because I own an HD650, and was looking for a sealed equivalent. As you all know, HD650 is an open can, and they're only good for home private listening. I was looking for a way to keep the music private in the public, but retain the same sound quality as the HD650. After reading numerous reviews on closed cans, I had finally decided on the SRH1540.
I'll spare you all from long boring reviews. I'll just confirm that most (trusted source) reviews you'll read on the SRH1540 are accurate.
Here's a quick run down...
The SRH1540 had more sub-bass compare to the HD650. And its bass is a bit loose. Approximately about +3db to +5db boost. But its expected from a closed can.
The midrange is excellent, close to being the HD650. Very smooth, silky, and grain free mids. The HD650 is still the king of midrange.
The upper mid is a bit boosted compare to the HD650, but only by a very small amount (about +1db).
The high is a bit recessed compare to the HD650, HD650 has higher upper extension.
The Alcantara pads together with the lower clamping force made the SRH1540 seems lighter than the HD650, even though the SRH1540 is actually 26grams heavier. Super comfortable.
As others have mentioned, this headphone deserves a decent amplifier. The typical smartphones doesn't drive the SRH1540 properly, and you'd loose out on the high extensions with congested sound. So be warned.
By the way, the HD650 scales up well with higher quality source, whereas the SRH1540 seems to hit a plateau. It appears that the SRH1540 capability peaks at 48kHz/24-bit source. But if most of what you listen to are CD quality 44kHz/16-bit, then no worries. Maybe the SRH1540 is geared towards more for the general audience.
And as a last note, that you might not find in any other reviews, is that because of the size of these headphones, I could see the edge of the ear cups with the corner of my eyes. The Alcantara + memory foam ear cup is kind of thick and large. I don't know if this is a nuisance for some, but just a heads up in case anyone cares.
So all in all, the SRH1540 is like the HD650 with a bit fun factor added, but still remains quite neutral.
Thank you Shure for making such a nice copy/refresh of the HD650 in a closed can.